From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zf9gJ-0008Rl-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:47:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zf9gG-0007oV-6V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:47:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zf9gG-0007oH-1D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:47:36 -0400 References: <1443111741-4736-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <1443111741-4736-13-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <560426E9.7000706@redhat.com> <1074324854.16808834.1443112861254.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <56042925.2010405@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:47:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1074324854.16808834.1443112861254.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2AOOKhqPhMMclr2AOXm2PtKHp67IFq9ec" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 12/21] vhost-user: document migration log List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= Cc: haifeng lin , mst@redhat.com, thibaut collet , jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, marcandre lureau This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --2AOOKhqPhMMclr2AOXm2PtKHp67IFq9ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/24/2015 10:41 AM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: >>> -only when the protocol feature VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ (bit 0) is s= et: >>> -#define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ 0 >>> +only when the protocol feature VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ (bit 0) is s= et. >> >> Should this hunk be in an earlier patch, >=20 > The series is on top of last Michael PULL request. I just moved the def= ine > in a common section, since now they are 2 and later 3. Does that make s= ense? Sure. My bad for not checking whether it was this series that introduced bit 0 vs. it being pre-existing from an earlier series. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --2AOOKhqPhMMclr2AOXm2PtKHp67IFq9ec Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWBCklAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nqv/kH/3Rgpgrf3oLILZ5oOhSHyOGI eFTcIM2Jo2jVEPHRR/Atf+/Gzo+AM9L6tdkgQqLbIPYb4XWux1cp2dOryoTYGrCs LEv7+6r+8JXfv3sX241a3JaGgMC+e7x+N/bkaj5Olpl7er0PN7gvJzew+hu7qd/0 Nj6W7xUHERfjYW3bgND42/ARCKAMKdlC/9KKMgr8yyw3EyDky9Nn/G0SE8aoudkL REoCWVzxhRx9uSEgNn1lXHS6XIQBCJeKoFX60DqXZSZnVYzRqi0IrHMz7ZtiLThZ IywV6Dit6jr92MxXHRuCjG5u1aCw1ds39UCk+eYIMb9ZxEHJQWc5Nc+WCzgyGQI= =iqp1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2AOOKhqPhMMclr2AOXm2PtKHp67IFq9ec--