From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfSKo-0005uk-Rw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:42:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfSKl-0005Wh-Lm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:42:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfSKl-0005WX-Hg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:42:39 -0400 References: <1443184788-18859-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1443184788-18859-7-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56054133.3080108@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:42:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1443184788-18859-7-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] cutils: Normalize qemu_strto[u]ll() signature List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Markus Armbruster , Bruce Rogers , Michael Roth , Lin Ma On 25/09/2015 14:39, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Instead of using int64_t for qemu_strtoll() and uiint64_t for > qemu_strtoull(), use long long and unsigned long long as their name > implies. >=20 > The only affected callers are our test cases. >=20 > This prepares for following checkpatch's recommendation of using it mor= e, > by making it easier to switch from POSIX to QEMU versions. > Remaining difference is const-ness. Do we actually use long long and unsigned long long anywhere? Paolo