From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfSYm-0000UT-Kq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:57:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfSYh-0005Ey-MK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:57:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfSYg-0005Er-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:57:03 -0400 References: <1443184788-18859-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1443184788-18859-7-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56054133.3080108@redhat.com> <56054198.1000400@suse.de> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56054496.6060603@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:56:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56054198.1000400@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] cutils: Normalize qemu_strto[u]ll() signature List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Markus Armbruster , Bruce Rogers , Michael Roth , Lin Ma On 25/09/2015 14:44, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > > Do we actually use long long and unsigned long long anywhere? >=20 > The next patch does, because checkpatch asks for it. :) >=20 > qemu_strtoull() has some special handling for Windows apparently. No, I really mean the types. :) The qemu_strtoll/qemu_strtoull functions use {,u}int64_t because they are much more used than long long and unsigned long long. Paolo