From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgVV7-0003fH-VE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:17:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgVV7-0003OR-A7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:17:41 -0400 References: <1438868176-20364-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1438868176-20364-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20150928101558.GD8756@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <560913BD.7060809@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:17:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150928101558.GD8756@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/18] qemu-thread: introduce QemuLockCnt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org On 28/09/2015 12:15, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:36:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > +int qemu_lockcnt_count(QemuLockCnt *lockcnt); > Why use int here when the counter field is unsigned? Nice catch, will fix. Paolo