From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Trivial <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
QEMU Developer <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] trace/simple: Fix warning and wrong trace file name for MinGW
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:50:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560961C7.7090209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56095A66.8050003@weilnetz.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1093 bytes --]
On 09/28/2015 09:19 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 28.09.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Eric Blake:
>> On 09/28/2015 02:26 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>
>>>> Can you explain why osdep.h's
>>>>
>>>> #define FMT_pid "%" PRId64
>>>>
>>>> is appropriate for Windows?
>>> Don't blame me for any strangeness which you might find in Windows. :-)
>>>
>>> Mingw-w64 sys/types.h defines pid_t to be either an int or an __int64.
>>> FMT_pid must match these definitions.
>>>
>>> But getpid returns an int, not a pid_t...
>> Can we 1) file a bug against mingw for their buggy getpid(), and 2)
>> write a wrapper that makes getpid() always return pid_t in the meantime?
>
> 1) No, because MinGW and Mingw-w64 use the same declaration as MS.
> They cannot change that, of course. Nor will MS correct this after many
> years, for obvious reasons.
If getpid() always returns int, then defining pid_t to __int64 feels
wrong. I still claim its a mingw bug to have a mismatch in types.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-28 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 20:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] trace/simple: Fix warning and wrong trace file name for MinGW Stefan Weil
2015-09-28 7:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-09-28 8:26 ` Stefan Weil
2015-09-28 15:06 ` Eric Blake
2015-09-28 15:19 ` Stefan Weil
2015-09-28 15:50 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2015-09-28 19:55 ` Stefan Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560961C7.7090209@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).