From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgsXG-0008MB-7e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:53:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgsXB-0005VX-52 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:53:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgsXB-0005VP-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:53:21 -0400 References: <1443523755-5873-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <560A6D9D.3030809@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:53:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1443523755-5873-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] util/mmap-alloc: add comments, assertions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell On 29/09/2015 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Document RAM guard page logic within mmap-alloc. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Paolo, can you pls confirm this is what you had in mind? > > util/mmap-alloc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/util/mmap-alloc.c b/util/mmap-alloc.c > index 05c8b4b..d978399 100644 > --- a/util/mmap-alloc.c > +++ b/util/mmap-alloc.c > @@ -12,9 +12,14 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > void *qemu_ram_mmap(int fd, size_t size, size_t align) > { > + /* > + * Note: this always allocates at least one extra page of virtual address > + * space, even if size is already aligned. > + */ > size_t total = size + align; > void *ptr = mmap(0, total, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); > size_t offset = QEMU_ALIGN_UP((uintptr_t)ptr, align) - (uintptr_t)ptr; > @@ -24,6 +29,11 @@ void *qemu_ram_mmap(int fd, size_t size, size_t align) > return NULL; > } > > + /* Make sure align is a power of 2 */ > + assert(!(align & (align - 1))); > + /* Always align to host page size */ > + assert(align >= getpagesize()); > + > ptr1 = mmap(ptr + offset, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > MAP_FIXED | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); > if (ptr1 == MAP_FAILED) { > @@ -37,6 +47,11 @@ void *qemu_ram_mmap(int fd, size_t size, size_t align) > if (offset > 0) { > munmap(ptr - offset, offset); > } > + > + /* > + * Leave a single PROT_NONE page allocated after the RAM block, to serve as > + * a guard page guarding against potential buffer overflows. > + */ > if (total > size + getpagesize()) { > munmap(ptr + size + getpagesize(), total - size - getpagesize()); > } > @@ -47,6 +62,7 @@ void *qemu_ram_mmap(int fd, size_t size, size_t align) > void qemu_ram_munmap(void *ptr, size_t size) > { > if (ptr) { > + /* Unmap both the RAM block and the guard page */ > munmap(ptr, size + getpagesize()); > } > } > Yes, thanks! Paolo