From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Marc Marí" <markmb@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Drew <drjones@redhat.com>,
Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] Make the kernel image in the fw_cfg DMA interface bootable
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:25:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560D5057.6010308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443701819-13855-7-git-send-email-markmb@redhat.com>
On 10/01/15 14:16, Marc Marí wrote:
> Add an entry to the bootorder file with name "vmlinux".
> Give this entry more priority than the romfile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 81d93b4..c4c51f7 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ static void load_linux(PCMachineState *pcms,
> fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_SETUP_DATA, setup, setup_size);
>
> option_rom[nb_option_roms].name = "linuxboot.bin";
> - option_rom[nb_option_roms].bootindex = 0;
> + option_rom[nb_option_roms].bootindex = 1;
> nb_option_roms++;
> +
> + add_boot_device_path(0, NULL, "vmlinux");
> }
>
> #define NE2000_NB_MAX 6
>
Where does this idea come from?
This will yet again break the invariant that the bootorder fw_cfg file
is a list of OpenFirmware device paths.
(The other annoying offender being "HALT", which caused me huge grief in
the OVMF OpenFirmware devpath parser parser, when libvirt decided that
"-boot strict=on" would become default.)
OVMF (and AAVMF) have been able to boot kernels directly from fw_cfg for
quite some time now, without the above change. They look at the fw_cfg
key 0x0008 (FW_CFG_KERNEL_SIZE). Direct kernel boot is being requested
iff the (little endian encoded) uint32 value is nonzero.
In QEMU, this role of FW_CFG_KERNEL_SIZE is true for:
- arm_load_kernel_notify() [hw/arm/boot.c], relied upon by AAVMF,
- load_multiboot() [hw/i386/multiboot.c] and
load_linux() [hw/i386/pc.c], relied upon by OVMF,
- "hw/ppc/mac_newworld.c", "hw/ppc/mac_oldworld.c", "hw/sparc/sun4m.c",
and "hw/sparc64/sun4u.c", relied upon by whatever boot firmware they
have.
Why is this necessary for SeaBIOS?
... I can see the function bootprio_find_vmlinux(), in SeaBIOS patch
[PATCH v4 2/2] Boot Linux using QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface
Given that direct kernel boot is always expected to take priority over
anything else (which is ensured by this QEMU patch too), can
bootprio_find_vmlinux() in SeaBIOS just look at the same fw_cfg key
(0x0008)?
I checked the QEMU_CFG_* macros in "src/fw/paravirt.c", and I think when
SeaBIOS boots an fw_cfg kernel *now*, it doesn't do it with its own
implementation; it probably launches the "linuxboot.bin" oprom (from
QEMU -- "pc-bios/optionrom/linuxboot.S").
I vaguely recall that this assembly code has been deemed unwieldy for
implementing the DMA interface (and I fully agree), which is why the
above-referenced SeaBIOS patch adds the capability to SeaBIOS itself. I
agree with that too.
But, instead of messing up the "bootorder" fw_cfg file, can
bootprio_find_vmlinux() look at the non-nullity of the
QEMU_CFG_KERNEL_SIZE key? Such as:
- read four bytes from under the fw_cfg selector QEMU_CFG_KERNEL_SIZE
(0x0008),
- if it is zero, return -1 --> no kernel boot requested,
- if it is nonzero, return 0 --> which means "top priority".
In other words, I agree with:
> - option_rom[nb_option_roms].bootindex = 0;
> + option_rom[nb_option_roms].bootindex = 1;
in this patch, but I disagree with:
> + add_boot_device_path(0, NULL, "vmlinux");
Thank you
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-01 12:14 [Qemu-devel] QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] " Marc Marí
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Marc Marí
2015-10-01 14:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/7] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí
2015-10-01 14:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 15:52 ` Marc Marí
2015-10-01 17:18 ` Peter Maydell
2015-10-01 19:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-06 14:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-06 14:53 ` Peter Maydell
2015-10-08 9:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-08 10:01 ` Marc Marí
2015-10-06 14:54 ` Marc Marí
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/7] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM Marc Marí
2015-10-01 14:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/7] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for x86 Marc Marí
2015-10-01 14:48 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] Make the kernel image in the fw_cfg DMA interface bootable Marc Marí
2015-10-01 15:25 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2015-10-01 16:02 ` Kevin O'Connor
2015-10-01 16:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 18:15 ` Marc Marí
2015-10-02 8:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-10-02 8:24 ` Marc Marí
2015-10-02 9:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-10-02 11:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-02 12:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-10-02 13:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-02 13:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-03 0:05 ` Jordan Justen
2015-10-02 13:38 ` Kevin O'Connor
2015-10-05 9:18 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-10-02 8:09 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-10-02 13:40 ` Kevin O'Connor
2015-10-02 13:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-02 15:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-10-05 9:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-10-01 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] fw_cfg: Define a static signature to be returned on DMA port reads Marc Marí
2015-10-01 16:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 17:02 ` Kevin O'Connor
2015-10-01 17:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] fw_cfg DMA interface Kevin O'Connor
2015-10-01 16:03 ` [Qemu-devel] QEMU " Eric Blake
2015-10-01 16:11 ` Eric Blake
2015-10-01 16:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 16:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 16:21 ` Eric Blake
2015-10-01 16:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560D5057.6010308@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=markmb@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=somlo@cmu.edu \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).