From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhgZn-00084o-LE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:19:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhgZm-0005Bt-RP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:19:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhgZm-0005Bf-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:19:22 -0400 References: <1443701677-13629-1-git-send-email-markmb@redhat.com> <560D5945.5050700@redhat.com> <560D5B1B.10104@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <560D5D05.3070607@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:19:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560D5B1B.10104@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc_Mar=c3=ad?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, seabios@seabios.org Cc: Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Drew , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Alexander Graf , Kevin O'Connor , Gerd Hoffmann On 10/01/15 18:11, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/01/2015 10:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> [meta-comment] >> >> On 10/01/2015 06:14 AM, Marc Mar=C3=AD wrote: >>> Implementation of the FW CFG DMA interface. >> >> The subject line is missing "v4" and "0/7". Also, the cover letter is >> missing a diffstat. That makes it harder to see from the cover letter >> what the rest of the series is about. 'git format-patch/send-email >> --cover-letter' does what you want; you can even 'git config >> format.coverletter=3Dauto' to always include a decent cover letter on = any >> multi-patch series. >=20 > Oh, I see - you sent a meta-cover letter (the one I replied to in this > subthread), and then a patch series including a cover letter (the real > 0/7, then 1/7 and friends in-reply-to the 0/7) as a child of the > meta-cover. It's still a bit awkward for tools that expect the 0/7 as > the start of the thread, Yep, the pattern I just described doesn't consider those tools. Is that a bad problem? Maybe the pattern is not so clever then. :) (I'm allowed to say bad things about it, because I "invented" it "independently". :)) > and part of my confusion was caused by > out-of-order mail delivery due to the nongnu.org mail server still > recovering from its mail delays. >=20 Right, those delays are not helping. Thanks Laszlo