From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjqBk-0000nc-GI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:59:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjqBh-0004yM-7F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:59:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjqBh-0004y2-0s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:59:25 -0400 References: <1444161658-15038-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1444161658-15038-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <35633.6639299572$1444206177@news.gmane.org> <5614DD31.4080000@redhat.com> <002e01d100e5$97a8ade0$c6fa09a0$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <5614F2AA.5080100@redhat.com> <002f01d100ec$d97bb4e0$8c731ea0$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <5614F89A.5020500@redhat.com> <003001d100ee$17234960$4569dc20$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56153346.6020000@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:59:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <003001d100ee$17234960$4569dc20$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] events doubts List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Dovgaluk , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 07/10/2015 12:51, Pavel Dovgaluk wrote: > > Why do they need to be separate on startup? Does initialization hang? > > My reasoning was that QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL is zero anyway at both init and > > reset. > > I'm not sure about current (only core functions) version, but full version > requires this because of loading virtual machine state and block devices initialization. > Events from these actions interfere with each other and with machine execution. Ok, thanks. Perhaps we could use the run state to only record/replay after these events have happened. Paolo