From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52822)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Zld6i-0005Mp-5h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:25:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Zld6c-0004CJ-Ma
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:25:40 -0400
References: <9B0F7F7B0E031F4A99FC8A50E22E3AA360FC1AFD@EU-MBX-01.mgc.mentorg.com>
	<CAFEAcA8CY2T0-gOMPphDYqHGqasH62EFSyxHvbd+Z5oG0gzAFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B0F7F7B0E031F4A99FC8A50E22E3AA360FC1B8E@EU-MBX-01.mgc.mentorg.com>
	<CAFEAcA_tYB6j-APrvPyDKAdNTjZay0-b-kC2LTQhRpDJ0pPxag@mail.gmail.com>
	<561103DF.5000704@redhat.com>
	<9B0F7F7B0E031F4A99FC8A50E22E3AA360FC2658@EU-MBX-01.mgc.mentorg.com>
	<5612CF1D.6050400@redhat.com>
	<9B0F7F7B0E031F4A99FC8A50E22E3AA360FC608A@EU-MBX-01.mgc.mentorg.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <561BB4C8.10702@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:25:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9B0F7F7B0E031F4A99FC8A50E22E3AA360FC608A@EU-MBX-01.mgc.mentorg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-discuss] TCP options ipv4 and ipv6 have no
	effect
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Sair, Umair" <Umair_Sair@mentor.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "qemu-discuss@nongnu.org" <qemu-discuss@nongnu.org>



On 12/10/2015 15:06, Sair, Umair wrote:
> Paolo, thanks for the explanation :)
> 
>> > Did you test the patch, and did it work for you?  If so, it is customary to reply with a line like "Tested by: Sair, Umair <Umair_Sair@mentor.com>".
> Yes, it worked for me. Should I reply to the email containing the patch with the above line?

No need to, thanks!

Paolo