From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37259) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn4qd-0006ZW-Oq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:15:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn4qY-0004J3-On for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:15:03 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]:32997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn4qY-0004IX-Ee for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:14:58 -0400 Received: by lbbpp2 with SMTP id pp2so71817324lbb.0 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <1444730188-5861-1-git-send-email-serge.fdrv@gmail.com> From: Sergey Fedorov Message-ID: <5620F84A.9090808@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:14:50 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] target-arm: Fix breakpoint handling List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers On 16.10.2015 16:01, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 10:56, Sergey Fedorov wrote: >> This series is intended to fix ARM breakpoint emulation misbehavior. >> QEMU hangs when QEMU breakpoint fires but it does not pass additional >> architectural checks in ARM CPU debug exception handler. For details, >> please see individual patches. The most relevant parts of the original >> discussion about ARM breakpoint emulation misbehavior can be found at: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg02715.html >> >> Changes in v3: >> * GDB breakpoint check in arm_debug_excp_handler() simplified >> * Debug exception generating fixed in translation code >> >> Changes in v2: >> * The initial commit split into two parts >> * Extra block eliminated in arm_debug_excp_handler() >> * Just one instruction always translated in case of breakpoint PC match >> >> Sergey Fedorov (1): >> target-arm: Fix CPU breakpoint handling > Something weird happened to this series -- you can see the > cover letter only mentions one of the two patches. > > I've applied them both to target-arm.next now. Yes, I figured out it a bit late that I had messed the cover letter... But it seemed to be not so important, and I decided not to resend the series. Best regards, Sergey