From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Qinghao Tang <luodalongde@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eepro100: prevent an infinite loop over same command block
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:02:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5625AEE0.7070908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1510162247310.4332@wniryva>
On 10/17/2015 01:19 AM, P J P wrote:
> +-- On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote --+
> | > + if (s->tx.link == s->cu_offset)
> | > + break;
> |
> | Please update the patch to conform to QEMU's coding standards; braces
> | are required even around single-statement blocks.
>
> Done. Please see an updated patch below.
>
> ===
> From bbf7b8914a984b09242e1cafc258bd71cecc47c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:43:29 +0530
> Subject: eepro100: prevent an infinite loop over same command block
>
> action_command() routine executes a chain of commands located
> in the Command Block List(CBL). Each Command Block(CB) has a
> link to the next CB in the list, given by 's->tx.link'.
> This is used in conjunction with the base address 's->cu_base'.
>
> An infinite loop unfolds if the 'link' to the next CB is
> same as the previous one, the loop ends up executing the same
> command over and over again.
>
> Reported-by: Qinghao Tang <luodalongde@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
> ---
> hw/net/eepro100.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/eepro100.c b/hw/net/eepro100.c
> index 60333b7..0e4ad4e 100644
> --- a/hw/net/eepro100.c
> +++ b/hw/net/eepro100.c
> @@ -863,6 +863,9 @@ static void action_command(EEPRO100State *s)
> uint16_t ok_status = STATUS_OK;
> s->cb_address = s->cu_base + s->cu_offset;
> read_cb(s);
> + if (s->tx.link == s->cu_offset) {
> + break;
> + }
> bit_el = ((s->tx.command & COMMAND_EL) != 0);
> bit_s = ((s->tx.command & COMMAND_S) != 0);
> bit_i = ((s->tx.command & COMMAND_I) != 0);
Can this survive if we had a chain like?
A->B->A
If not, looks like we need to limit the maximum number of commands in a
chain? (e.g 256)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-16 11:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eepro100: prevent an infinite loop over same command block P J P
2015-10-16 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-16 17:19 ` P J P
2015-10-16 21:37 ` Stefan Weil
2015-10-17 11:25 ` P J P
2015-10-17 11:35 ` Peter Maydell
2015-10-20 3:04 ` Jason Wang
2015-10-20 3:10 ` max
2015-10-20 3:02 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-11-03 18:49 ` P J P
2015-11-04 3:31 ` Jason Wang
2015-11-20 2:43 ` Qinghao Tang
2015-11-20 6:10 ` P J P
2015-11-20 6:29 ` Qinghao Tang
2015-11-20 7:23 ` P J P
2015-11-20 7:47 ` Stefan Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5625AEE0.7070908@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=luodalongde@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).