From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50617)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1ZoWnC-0005ah-WD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:17:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1ZoWn5-0005Yd-D8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:17:30 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52937)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1ZoWn5-0005YD-6R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:17:23 -0400
References: <025701d10b2b$d833d5b0$889b8110$@samsung.com>
	<56263079.6070306@redhat.com> <562635D3.9010501@suse.de>
	<20151020125434.GI14616@redhat.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Message-ID: <56263EE0.8060607@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:17:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151020125434.GI14616@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PING: [PATCH v4 0/7] qom: more efficient object
 property handling
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 'Markus Armbruster' <armbru@redhat.com>

Am 20.10.2015 um 14:54 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 02:38:43PM +0200, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote:
>> Two problems apart from time: 1) Discussions about iterator design, 2)
>> lack of test cases, and that applies to iterator-less v2, too. Circles
>> back to me (or someone) looking into qom-proplist test.
>=20
> FYI in the v4 posting, I added to the check-qom-proplist.c test case
> to cover the new iterator APIs. I further added to it in the later
> patches to cover the iteration of properties against classes. The v4
> also has the alternative iterator design that Markus / Paolo preferred,
> that avoids use of callback functions.
>=20
> I can further test cases to do more coverage of object proprty handling
> wrt to classes, if you want me to.

No, if that is sorted out now, I'll drop v2 and need to review v4.

Cheers,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=
=C3=BCrnberg)