From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpaHA-0000zs-83 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:12:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpaH7-0004ye-HP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:12:48 -0400 Received: from mail1.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.43]:60415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpaH7-0004tO-Ah for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:12:45 -0400 References: <1445522453-14450-1-git-send-email-P@draigBrady.com> <5628F4BC.2040502@redhat.com> <5628F634.6040809@redhat.com> <5628FE20.80802@draigBrady.com> <56290152.7010408@redhat.com> <562908A6.3000307@redhat.com> <56290B55.2000703@redhat.com> <20151022173919.GC14789@potion.brq.redhat.com> <56293D5D.2030107@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?= Message-ID: <562A1625.60900@lincor.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:12:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56293D5D.2030107@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] copy, dd: simplify and optimize NUL bytes detection List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Cc: Rusty Russell , coreutils@gnu.org, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 22/10/15 20:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 22/10/2015 19:39, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> 2015-10-22 18:14+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >>> On 22/10/2015 18:02, Eric Blake wrote: >>>> I see a bug in there: >>> >>> Of course. You shouldn't have told me what the bug was, I deserved >>> to look for it myself. :) >> >> It rather seems that you don't want spoilers, :) >> >> I see two bugs now. > > Me too. :) But Rusty surely has some testcases in case he wants to > adopt some of the ideas here. O:-) For completeness this should address the bugs I think? bool memeqzero4_paolo(const void *data, size_t length) { const unsigned char *p = data; unsigned long word; if (!length) return true; /* Check len bytes not aligned on a word. */ while (__builtin_expect(length & (sizeof(word) - 1), 0)) { if (*p) return false; p++; length--; if (!length) return true; } /* Check up to 16 bytes a word at a time. */ for (;;) { memcpy(&word, p, sizeof(word)); if (word) return false; p += sizeof(word); length -= sizeof(word); if (!length) return true; if (__builtin_expect(length & 15, 0) == 0) break; } /* Now we know that's zero, memcmp with self. */ return memcmp(data, p, length) == 0; } compiled with gcc 5.1.1 -march=native -O2 on an i3-2310M we get these timings: bytes 1 8 16 512 65536 --------------------------------------------- Rusty: 10 28 59 114 6510 Paolo: 9 9 12 75 6495 It's also smaller, especially at -O3: $ nm -S a.out | grep memeqzero4 ... 000000000000005b t memeqzero4_paolo ... 0000000000000063 t memeqzero4_rusty $ gcc -march=native -O3 memeqzero.c $ nm -S a.out | grep memeqzero4 ... 000000000000005b t memeqzero4_paolo ... 0000000000000133 t memeqzero4_rusty cheers, Pádraig.