From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37179)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1ZpdVo-0004Lk-5e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:40:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1ZpdVk-0007IQ-Ka
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:40:07 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41747)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1ZpdVk-0007I1-G0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:40:04 -0400
References: <1444667140-9449-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<561BEEA1.5030500@redhat.com>
	<20151013193044.GR1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<561D5EBA.7060703@redhat.com>
	<20151013194540.GS1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <562A46C1.4010907@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:40:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151013194540.GS1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: allow any alignment for SMBASE
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: michael.d.kinney@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>

Eduardo,

On 10/13/15 21:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are
>>> just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different
>>> (and less surprising?) way.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With the typo fix in the Cc tag:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>
>> Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not
>> super urgent.
> 
> Applied. Thanks!
> 

can you please send a PULL with this?

We're in soft freeze for 2.5, according to
<http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.5>, but this qualifies I think.

Thanks!
Laszlo