From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpjrx-00059q-Tp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:27:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpjru-0006ez-J7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:27:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpjru-0006eI-Dp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:27:22 -0400 References: <1444667140-9449-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <561BEEA1.5030500@redhat.com> <20151013193044.GR1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <561D5EBA.7060703@redhat.com> <20151013194540.GS1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <562A46C1.4010907@redhat.com> <20151023181940.GH3736@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <562AA637.3020102@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:27:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151023181940.GH3736@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: allow any alignment for SMBASE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: michael.d.kinney@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jordan Justen On 10/23/15 20:19, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:40:01PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Eduardo, >> >> On 10/13/15 21:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>>>> Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are >>>>> just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different >>>>> (and less surprising?) way. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With the typo fix in the Cc tag: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek >>>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost >>>> >>>> Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not >>>> super urgent. >>> >>> Applied. Thanks! >>> >> >> can you please send a PULL with this? >> >> We're in soft freeze for 2.5, according to >> , but this qualifies I think. > > Done (and pulled by Peter). Sorry for delaying the pull request until > after soft freeze. Not a problem, and thanks a lot to you both :) I wasn't concerned about the soft freeze (mainly), I just got bored rebasing the patch again and again :) Thanks! Laszlo