From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>
Cc: Sergey Fionov <fionov@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 4k seq read splitting for virtio-blk - possible workarounds?
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:37:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562E56B8.2030109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABYiri_saUt_zujydtiuENCWgNSEU3F1TKBpiASWTx1Uk=uv0g@mail.gmail.com>
On 26/10/2015 17:31, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
>> the virtio block device is always splitting a single read
>> range request to 4k ones, bringing the overall performance of the
>> sequential reads far below virtio-scsi.
>>
>> How does the blktrace look like in the guest?
>
> Yep, thanks for suggestion. It looks now like a pure driver issue:
>
> Reads Queued: 11008, 44032KiB Writes Queued: 0, 0KiB
> Read Dispatches: 11008, 44032KiB Write Dispatches: 0, 0KiB
>
> vs
>
> Reads Queued: 185728, 742912KiB Writes Queued: 0, 0KiB
> Read Dispatches: 2902, 742912KiB Write Dispatches: 0, 0KiB
>
> Because guest virtio-blk driver lacks *any* blk scheduler management,
> this is kinda logical. Requests for scsi backend are dispatched in
^^^^^^^^^^
queued you mean?
> single block-sized chunks as well, but they are mostly merged by a
> scheduler before being passed to the device layer. Could be there any
> improvements over the situation except writing an underlay b/w virtio
> emulator backend and the real storage?
This is probably the fall-out of converting the virtio-blk to use
blk-mq, which was premature to say the least. Jeff Moyer was working on
it, but I'm not sure if this has been merged. Andrey, what kernel are
you using?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-26 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-26 11:50 [Qemu-devel] 4k seq read splitting for virtio-blk - possible workarounds? Andrey Korolyov
2015-10-26 15:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-26 16:31 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-10-26 16:37 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-10-26 16:43 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-10-26 17:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-26 17:18 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-10-26 17:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-26 18:28 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-10-27 2:04 ` Fam Zheng
2015-10-27 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-30 20:04 ` Andrey Korolyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562E56B8.2030109@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=andrey@xdel.ru \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fionov@gmail.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).