From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48985) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7b3-0005zM-N2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7ay-0000GN-UF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7ay-0000GJ-OI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:36 -0400 References: <012d01d110a7$b1915690$14b403b0$@samsung.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <562FAD77.6060704@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Pavel Fedin Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Crosthwaite , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini On 10/27/2015 07:16 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 October 2015 at 11:07, Pavel Fedin wrote: >>> (Everything should still be cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) >> >> I would drop this requirement, except for stuff which could touch >> core functionality (qom, qobject). > > This is a standard requirement for all our sub-mailing lists -- > not everybody is subscribed to all of them, and it is useful > to be able to get an overview of everything going on by > subscribing to a single mailing list. > > thanks > -- PMM > Just to jump on and bead a dead horse, I am not OK with the idea of a mailing list where patches might get reviewed and staged for pull without the general population of qemu-devel being able to look first. I don't want to have to scan the [PULL] tag hoping to catch things of interest to me that were reviewed on opaque-to-me sub-mailing lists. --js