From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Leonid Bloch <leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@daynix.com>,
Leonid Bloch <leonid@daynix.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce Intel 82574 GbE Controller Emulation (e1000e)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:44:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563060C1.7030209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445792408-28571-1-git-send-email-leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com>
On 10/26/2015 01:00 AM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
> Hello qemu-devel,
>
> This patch series is an RFC for the new networking device emulation
> we're developing for QEMU.
>
> This new device emulates the Intel 82574 GbE Controller and works
> with unmodified Intel e1000e drivers from the Linux/Windows kernels.
>
> The status of the current series is "Functional Device Ready, work
> on Extended Features in Progress".
>
> More precisely, these patches represent a functional device, which
> is recognized by the standard Intel drivers, and is able to transfer
> TX/RX packets with CSO/TSO offloads, according to the spec.
>
> Extended features not supported yet (work in progress):
> 1. TX/RX Interrupt moderation mechanisms
> 2. RSS
> 3. Full-featured multi-queue (use of multiqueued network backend)
>
> Also, there will be some code refactoring and performance
> optimization efforts.
>
> This series was tested on Linux (Fedora 22) and Windows (2012R2)
> guests, using Iperf, with TX/RX and TCP/UDP streams, and various
> packet sizes.
>
> More thorough testing, including data streams with different MTU
> sizes, and Microsoft Certification (HLK) tests, are pending missing
> features' development.
>
> See commit messages (esp. "net: Introduce e1000e device emulation")
> for more information about the development approaches and the
> architecture options chosen for this device.
>
> This series is based upon v2.3.0 tag of the upstream QEMU repository,
> and it will be rebased to latest before the final submission.
>
> Please share your thoughts - any feedback is highly welcomed :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Dmitry Fleytman.
Thanks for the series. Will go through this in next few days.
Since 2.5 is in soft freeze, this looks a 2.6 material.
>
> Dmitry Fleytman (5):
> net: Add macros for ETH address tracing
> net_pkt: Name vmxnet3 packet abstractions more generic
> net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as requied by e1000e functionality
> e1000_regs: Add definitions for Intel 82574-specific bits
> net: Introduce e1000e device emulation
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> default-configs/pci.mak | 1 +
> hw/net/Makefile.objs | 5 +-
> hw/net/e1000_regs.h | 201 ++++-
> hw/net/e1000e.c | 531 ++++++++++++
> hw/net/e1000e_core.c | 2081 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/net/e1000e_core.h | 181 +++++
> hw/net/net_rx_pkt.c | 273 +++++++
> hw/net/net_rx_pkt.h | 241 ++++++
> hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c | 606 ++++++++++++++
> hw/net/net_tx_pkt.h | 191 +++++
> hw/net/vmxnet3.c | 80 +-
> hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.c | 187 -----
> hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.h | 174 ----
> hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c | 567 -------------
> hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.h | 148 ----
> include/net/eth.h | 90 +-
> include/net/net.h | 5 +
> net/eth.c | 152 +++-
> tests/Makefile | 4 +-
> trace-events | 68 ++
> 21 files changed, 4597 insertions(+), 1191 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 hw/net/e1000e.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/e1000e_core.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/e1000e_core.h
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_rx_pkt.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_rx_pkt.h
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_tx_pkt.h
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.c
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.h
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.h
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-25 17:00 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce Intel 82574 GbE Controller Emulation (e1000e) Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: Add macros for ETH address tracing Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/5] net_pkt: Name vmxnet3 packet abstractions more generic Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/5] net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as requied by e1000e functionality Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/5] e1000_regs: Add definitions for Intel 82574-specific bits Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/5] net: Introduce e1000e device emulation Leonid Bloch
2015-10-28 5:44 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-10-28 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce Intel 82574 GbE Controller Emulation (e1000e) Dmitry Fleytman
2015-10-30 5:28 ` Jason Wang
2015-10-31 5:52 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2015-11-02 3:35 ` Jason Wang
2015-11-02 7:49 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2015-11-03 5:44 ` Jason Wang
2015-11-03 9:17 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2016-01-13 4:43 ` Prem Mallappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563060C1.7030209@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry@daynix.com \
--cc=leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=leonid@daynix.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).