From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrSWl-0001up-CN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:20:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrSWg-0000aQ-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:20:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrSWf-0000aK-Th for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:20:34 -0400 References: <012d01d110a7$b1915690$14b403b0$@samsung.com> <562FAD77.6060704@redhat.com> <008601d1114c$c5fa0aa0$51ee1fe0$@samsung.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <5630E7BF.8000000@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:20:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <008601d1114c$c5fa0aa0$51ee1fe0$@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Fedin , 'Peter Maydell' Cc: "'Edgar E. Iglesias'" , 'Peter Crosthwaite' , =?UTF-8?Q?'Alex_Benn=c3=a9e'?= , 'QEMU Developers' , 'Paolo Bonzini' On 10/28/2015 02:49 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >> Just to jump on and bead a dead horse, I am not OK with the idea of a >> mailing list where patches might get reviewed and staged for pull >> without the general population of qemu-devel being able to look first. > > Ok ok, i don't object, Peter has already explained a similar thing to me, and i silently agreed. > > Kind regards, > Pavel Fedin > Expert Engineer > Samsung Electronics Research center Russia > > Sorry :) I am of course in favor of the list in general. qemu-block has been very useful for us. --js