From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnPB-0007Ne-2J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:11:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnPA-0004IE-Bc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:11:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:52760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnPA-0004Gw-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:11:56 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id m1so1688373wml.2 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:11:54 -0800 (PST) References: <20190104175847.6290-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20190104175847.6290-17-philmd@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <5634aacb-5c84-e895-a8d7-65dfa92ef385@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:11:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 16/16] RFC hw/net/smc91c111: Convert init helper into an inline function List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Magnus Damm , David Gibson , Andrew Jeffery , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Joel Stanley , Peter Maydell , Andrzej Zaborowski , Igor Mitsyanko , Beniamino Galvani , Michael Walle , Richard Henderson , Jan Kiszka , Jason Wang , Gerd Hoffmann , Peter Chubb , Aurelien Jarno , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= , Bastian Koppelmann , Rob Herring On 1/4/19 8:35 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 2019-01-04 18:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé >> --- >> As init helper in "hw/char/pl011.h" >> --- >> hw/net/smc91c111.c | 17 ----------------- >> include/hw/net/smc91c111.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Why? If you move code around like this, you should mention the reason in > the patch description. Oops this one wasn't supposed to be sent, I planned to drop it before sending but probably forgot because it was late friday :/