From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54864)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1Zuhlz-0006kJ-Nn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:13:48 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1Zuhls-0000hL-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:13:47 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:33058)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1Zuhls-0000hB-Fh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:13:40 -0500
Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so30931044wij.0
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
References: <1446672286-9136-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<1446672286-9136-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<563C8958.20709@twiddle.net>
	<20151106135919.GR4180@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Message-ID: <563CB58F.90305@twiddle.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:13:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151106135919.GR4180@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] target-i386: tcg: Accept clwb
	instruction
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On 11/06/2015 02:59 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Thanks! BTW, clflush uses gen_lea_modrm() too, does it do anything with
> the address somewhere else?

Nope.  It probably pre-dates the introduction of gen_nop_modrm.


r~