From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: add missed aio_context_acquire around bdrv_set_aio_context
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:19:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563CB709.4060907@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563CB48D.1010301@openvz.org>
On 11/06/2015 05:09 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 04:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:27:22PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> It is required for bdrv_drain.
>> What bug does this patch fix?
>>
>> Existing blk_set_aio_context() callers acquire the AioContext or are
>> sure it's already acquired by their caller, so I don't see where the bug
>> is.
>>
>> No function in block/block-backend.c acquires AioContext internally.
>> The same reasoning I mentioned in another email thread about consistent
>> locking strategy applies here. Either all blk_*() functions should take
>> the AioContext internally (which I disagree with) or none of them should
>> take it.
>
> #5 0x00005555559b31bf in bdrv_drain (bs=0x5555564274a0) at
> block/io.c:258
> #6 0x0000555555963321 in bdrv_set_aio_context (bs=0x5555564274a0,
> new_context=0x55555640c100) at block.c:3764
> #7 0x00005555559a8b67 in blk_set_aio_context (blk=0x555556425d20,
> new_context=0x55555640c100) at block/block-backend.c:1068
> #8 0x00005555556a4c52 in virtio_scsi_hotplug
> (hotplug_dev=0x5555579f22b0,
> dev=0x555557bc8470, errp=0x7fffffffd9e0)
> at /home/den/src/qemu/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:773
> #9 0x00005555557eb3e2 in hotplug_handler_plug
> (plug_handler=0x5555579f22b0,
> plugged_dev=0x555557bc8470, errp=0x7fffffffd9e0) at
> hw/core/hotplug.c:22
> #10 0x00005555557e7794 in device_set_realized (obj=0x555557bc8470,
> value=true,
> errp=0x7fffffffdb90) at hw/core/qdev.c:1066
> #11 0x000055555595580b in property_set_bool (obj=0x555557bc8470,
> v=0x555557b51bc0, opaque=0x555557bc8740, name=0x555555a43841
> "realized",
> errp=0x7fffffffdb90) at qom/object.c:1708
> #12 0x0000555555953e2a in object_property_set (obj=0x555557bc8470,
> v=0x555557b51bc0, name=0x555555a43841 "realized",
> errp=0x7fffffffdb90)
> at qom/object.c:965
> #13 0x00005555559566c7 in object_property_set_qobject
> (obj=0x555557bc8470,
> value=0x555557bc8370, name=0x555555a43841 "realized",
> errp=0x7fffffffdb90)
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> at qom/qom-qobject.c:24
> #14 0x00005555559540cd in object_property_set_bool (obj=0x555557bc8470,
> value=true, name=0x555555a43841 "realized", errp=0x7fffffffdb90)
> at qom/object.c:1034
> #15 0x0000555555760e47 in qdev_device_add (opts=0x5555563f90f0,
> errp=0x7fffffffdc18) at qdev-monitor.c:589
> #16 0x0000555555772501 in device_init_func (opaque=0x0,
> opts=0x5555563f90f0,
> errp=0x0) at vl.c:2305
> #17 0x0000555555a198cb in qemu_opts_foreach (
> list=0x555555e96a60 <qemu_device_opts>,
> func=0x5555557724c3 <device_init_func>, opaque=0x0, errp=0x0)
> at util/qemu-option.c:1114
> #18 0x0000555555777b20 in main (argc=83, argv=0x7fffffffe058,
> envp=0x7fffffffe2f8) at vl.c:4523
>
> You want the lock to be taken by the function. It would be
> quite natural to add assert(aio_context_is_owner(ctx)) in that
> case.
>
> This assert will fail if the lock is not taken even if the thread
> is not started yet. With assert that lock is taken qemu
> will crash here and in bdrv_close called through
> bdrv_delete. In that case caller can re-acquire the lock.
> We can take the lock in the main thread immediately when
> iothread was stopped.
>
> Den
it seems that virt_block and virt-scsi take locks in
a wrong order.. Something like this should be
applied.
There is something similar in virt-block code.
blk_set_aio_context(s->conf->conf.blk, s->ctx);
/* Kick right away to begin processing requests already in vring */
event_notifier_set(virtio_queue_get_host_notifier(vq));
/* Get this show started by hooking up our callbacks */
aio_context_acquire(s->ctx);
aio_set_event_notifier(s->ctx, &s->host_notifier, true,
handle_notify);
aio_context_release(s->ctx);
return;
Den
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-06 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-04 17:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2.5 v2 0/3] misc missed aio_context_acquire for bdrv_drain Denis V. Lunev
2015-11-04 17:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: add missed aio_context_acquire around bdrv_set_aio_context Denis V. Lunev
2015-11-06 13:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-11-06 14:09 ` Denis V. Lunev
2015-11-06 14:19 ` Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2015-11-06 14:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-11-06 14:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-11-06 14:51 ` Denis V. Lunev
2015-11-06 14:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-11-04 17:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] blockdev: acquire AioContext in hmp_commit() Denis V. Lunev
2015-11-06 15:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-11-04 17:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: guard bdrv_drain in bdrv_close with aio_context_acquire Denis V. Lunev
2015-11-06 13:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563CB709.4060907@openvz.org \
--to=den@openvz.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).