From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvfg8-0001Ga-Nb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:11:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvfg3-0005ug-Md for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:11:44 -0500 Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:46632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvfg3-0005uW-F0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:11:39 -0500 References: <563E16AF.8070209@openvz.org> <1446910812-13044-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> From: "Denis V. Lunev" Message-ID: <5640390A.9090606@openvz.org> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 09:11:22 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] migration: qemu_savevm_state_cleanup becomes mandatory operation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Li, Liang Z" Cc: Amit Shah , Paolo Bonzini , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Juan Quintela On 11/09/2015 08:10 AM, Li, Liang Z wrote: >> since commit >> commit 94f5a43704129ca4995aa3385303c5ae225bde42 >> Author: Liang Li >> Date: Mon Nov 2 15:37:00 2015 +0800 >> >> migration: defer migration_end & blk_mig_cleanup >> >> when actual .cleanup callbacks calling was removed from complete operations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev >> CC: Paolo Bonzini >> CC: Juan Quintela >> CC: Amit Shah >> --- >> migration/savevm.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c index e05158d..9f2230f >> 100644 >> --- a/migration/savevm.c >> +++ b/migration/savevm.c >> @@ -942,8 +942,8 @@ static int qemu_savevm_state(QEMUFile *f, Error >> **errp) >> qemu_savevm_state_complete(f); >> ret = qemu_file_get_error(f); >> } >> + qemu_savevm_state_cleanup(); >> if (ret != 0) { >> - qemu_savevm_state_cleanup(); >> error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Error while writing VM state"); >> } >> return ret; >> -- >> 2.5.0 >> > > Yes, you are right. Thanks a lot. > > BTW, can this patch fix the regression you reported? > > Reviewed-by: Liang Li > yes