From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvnfR-0001Q5-H2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:43:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvnfN-0003AG-Ct for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:43:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvnfN-0003AC-81 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:43:29 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728B619F960 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:43:28 +0000 (UTC) References: <1446791754-23823-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <87oaf7xghp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <563CD085.7040203@redhat.com> <87611bmr2q.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <5640B109.5050104@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 07:43:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87611bmr2q.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EIAV6swnNrt6e7dQw4OPFLo8quOc2k4Dj" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 00/30] qapi member collision (post-introspection cleanups, subset C') List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --EIAV6swnNrt6e7dQw4OPFLo8quOc2k4Dj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/09/2015 02:59 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Eric Blake writes: >=20 >> On 11/06/2015 09:03 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> Eric Blake writes: > [...] >>>> Hopefully, we are converging on something that will be ready >>>> for a pull request, especially for the earlier patches of this >>>> subset. >>> >>> I guess you mean PATCH 01-12. I had a few questions, but the most >>> likely outcome seems to be minor touchups I could apply in my tree. >>> >>> I'm okay with trying to get more patches in, but let's get these out = of >>> the way meanwhile. >> >> Yes, 01-12 seems like a good first set, if you want to make those >> touchups (I've supplied some potential text improvements in reply to >> some of your comments); I'm happy, as always, to take a peek over your= >> staging repo to double check what you are prepping for the pull reques= t. >=20 > Please have a look at my qapi-next branch. Close, but commit 5f72bb85 on that branch is missing the one-line summary= : qapi: Simplify error cleanup in test-qmp-* --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --EIAV6swnNrt6e7dQw4OPFLo8quOc2k4Dj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWQLEPAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqJIAH/2SrskmS6YzMoPMmIqD9PY3a +IPzSM5JSwqINh7kv6TPAVaXcyppfJGNFAGzbQMtUT454aECHgnasXSkmlFk8xi8 hT3bXTzSY7WKrCnYQF76L2Qbt17xQbBHuJu/l+S/au1QsQsogdwJedMK0JSLs+PG 35ejv0eSpph+gL9mfGAy/vM4MKJkL/j5nAW/DFqooO8Ivhm4hxZo2vfm3mOIeFn8 odHQx3ds9NW7wrcmzxsTloXCMElV0O/lGnpIWpbodm/hWQGCDtHP5neHADIqVu4X NkA11E73G/QYUMfimcd7P9xBrOunRJtasqcm1KoUIhem5uuJ/mUJ3d7dt92LtVE= =99KN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EIAV6swnNrt6e7dQw4OPFLo8quOc2k4Dj--