qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v6 03/15] block: Release dirty bitmaps in bdrv_close()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:21:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5640C7FF.8070203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563CF891.8070008@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4539 bytes --]

On 06.11.2015 19:59, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/04/2015 01:57 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> bdrv_delete() is not very happy about deleting BlockDriverStates with
>> dirty bitmaps still attached to them. In the past, we got around that
>> very easily by relying on bdrv_close_all() bypassing bdrv_delete(), and
>> bdrv_close() simply ignoring that condition. We should fix that by
>> releasing all dirty bitmaps in bdrv_close() and drop the assertion in
>> bdrv_delete().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  block.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
>> index 3493501..23448ed 100644
>> --- a/block.c
>> +++ b/block.c
>> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ static int bdrv_open_inherit(BlockDriverState **pbs, const char *filename,
>>                               const BdrvChildRole *child_role, Error **errp);
>>  
>>  static void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs);
>> +static void bdrv_release_all_dirty_bitmaps(BlockDriverState *bs);
>> +
>>  /* If non-zero, use only whitelisted block drivers */
>>  static int use_bdrv_whitelist;
>>  
>> @@ -1916,6 +1918,8 @@ void bdrv_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>      bdrv_drain(bs); /* in case flush left pending I/O */
>>      notifier_list_notify(&bs->close_notifiers, bs);
>>  
>> +    bdrv_release_all_dirty_bitmaps(bs);
>> +
>>      if (bs->blk) {
>>          blk_dev_change_media_cb(bs->blk, false);
>>      }
>> @@ -2123,7 +2127,6 @@ static void bdrv_delete(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>      assert(!bs->job);
>>      assert(bdrv_op_blocker_is_empty(bs));
>>      assert(!bs->refcnt);
>> -    assert(QLIST_EMPTY(&bs->dirty_bitmaps));
>>  
>>      bdrv_close(bs);
>>  
>> @@ -3318,6 +3321,21 @@ void bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * Release all dirty bitmaps attached to a BDS, independently of whether they
>> + * are frozen or not (for use in bdrv_close()).
>> + */
> 
> This comment caught my attention ...
> 
>> +static void bdrv_release_all_dirty_bitmaps(BlockDriverState *bs)
>> +{
>> +    BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm, *next;
>> +    QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(bm, &bs->dirty_bitmaps, list, next) {
>> +        QLIST_REMOVE(bm, list);
>> +        hbitmap_free(bm->bitmap);
>> +        g_free(bm->name);
>> +        g_free(bm);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  void bdrv_disable_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>>  {
>>      assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(bitmap));
>>
> 
> Currently, the only way a bitmap could/should be frozen is if it is in
> use by a job. If a job is running, you probably shouldn't delete stuff
> it is using out from under it.

Right. Good thing I'm fixing everything and bdrv_close() will no longer
be called unless there are no references to the BDS anymore (and each
block job holds an own reference to its BDS). :-)

(At least that's how it's supposed to be; also, there is an
assert(!bs->job) in bdrv_close())

Also, I wanted to mirror current behavior. Right now, we are just
leaking all dirty bitmaps on bdrv_close() (bdrv_delete() asserts that
there are none, but if you invoke bdrv_close() directly...).

> I am assuming by now that it's actually likely that you've canceled any
> jobs attached to this node before you go through the motions of deleting
> it, and it should be safe to just call bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap ...

Well, yes, but then I'd have to iterate through all the dirty bitmaps to
call bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap() for each of them, and then
bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap() iterates through all of them again to check
whether it really belongs to the BDS. That seemed a bit like a waste.

> We don't want the two foreach loops though, so maybe just factor out a
> helper that bdrv_release_all_dirty_bitmaps and bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap
> can share. You can leave the frozen assertion
> in just bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap before it invokes the helper, so that
> bdrv_delete always succeeds in case something gets out-of-sync in the
> internals.

Hm, yes, that should do just fine, thanks.

> (Hmm, to prevent leaks, if you delete a bitmap that is frozen, you
> should probably call the helper on its child object too... or just make
> the helper recursive.)

I think it'll be actually better to just keep the assertion in and thus
not allow releasing frozen dirty bitmaps in bdrv_close(). In addition
I'll add an assertion that !bs->refcount to bdrv_close().

Max


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-09 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04 18:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 for-2.6 00/15] block: Rework bdrv_close_all() Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/15] blockdev: Add missing bdrv_unref() in drive-backup Max Reitz
2015-11-09 13:21   ` Alberto Garcia
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/15] blockjob: Call bdrv_unref() on creation error Max Reitz
2015-11-09 13:23   ` Alberto Garcia
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/15] block: Release dirty bitmaps in bdrv_close() Max Reitz
2015-11-06 18:59   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2015-11-09 16:21     ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-11-09 21:00       ` Max Reitz
2015-11-09 16:04   ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2015-11-09 16:47     ` Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/15] iotests: Move _filter_nbd into common.filter Max Reitz
2015-11-09 16:04   ` Kevin Wolf
2015-11-09 18:17     ` Max Reitz
2015-11-09 18:20       ` Max Reitz
2015-11-10 10:25       ` Kevin Wolf
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 05/15] iotests: Make redirecting qemu's stderr optional Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 06/15] iotests: Add test for eject under NBD server Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 07/15] block: Move BDS close notifiers into BB Max Reitz
2015-11-09 16:04   ` Kevin Wolf
2015-11-09 16:50     ` Max Reitz
2015-11-09 16:59       ` Kevin Wolf
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/15] block: Use blk_remove_bs() in blk_delete() Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 09/15] blockdev: Use blk_remove_bs() in do_drive_del() Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 10/15] block: Make bdrv_close() static Max Reitz
2015-11-09 13:25   ` Alberto Garcia
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/15] block: Add list of all BlockDriverStates Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 12/15] blockdev: Keep track of monitor-owned BDS Max Reitz
2015-11-09 15:05   ` Alberto Garcia
2015-11-09 16:26     ` Kevin Wolf
2015-11-09 16:38       ` Alberto Garcia
2015-11-09 16:28     ` Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 13/15] block: Add blk_remove_all_bs() Max Reitz
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 14/15] block: Rewrite bdrv_close_all() Max Reitz
2015-11-05 17:15   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-05 17:37     ` Max Reitz
2015-11-05 17:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-05 17:44         ` Eric Blake
2015-11-05 17:54           ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-04 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 15/15] iotests: Add test for multiple BB on BDS tree Max Reitz
2015-11-09 16:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 for-2.6 00/15] block: Rework bdrv_close_all() Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5640C7FF.8070203@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).