From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5LV-0002QX-Rt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:36:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5LS-0008C3-Hb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:36:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5LS-0008Bz-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:36:06 -0500 References: <1447123907-26750-1-git-send-email-liang.z.li@intel.com> <564167C4.2060702@redhat.com> <87h9ku8bev.fsf@emacs.mitica> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5641BA7B.4050108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:35:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Li, Liang Z" , "quintela@redhat.com" Cc: "amit.shah@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "mst@redhat.com" On 10/11/2015 10:26, Li, Liang Z wrote: > I don't know Paolo's opinion about how to deal with the SSE2 > Intrinsics, he is the author. From my personal view, now that we have > found a better way, why to use such low level SSE2/AVX2 Intrinsics. I totally agree. :) Paolo