From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5jA-0005BG-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:00:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5j5-0005pE-UP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:00:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5j5-0005p2-PB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:00:31 -0500 References: <1447123907-26750-1-git-send-email-liang.z.li@intel.com> <564167C4.2060702@redhat.com> <87h9ku8bev.fsf@emacs.mitica> <5641BA7B.4050108@redhat.com> <5641BDDD.1070909@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5641C034.10509@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:00:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Li, Liang Z" , "quintela@redhat.com" Cc: "amit.shah@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "mst@redhat.com" On 10/11/2015 10:56, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > I agree that your patch can be dropped, but go ahead and submit your > > improvements! > > You mean I do this work? > If you are busy, I can do this. It's not that I'm busy, it's that it's your idea. It doesn't matter if I (and Peter Lieven too, actually) originally did the optimizations. You also have the infrastructure to benchmark the improvements. Paolo