From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDDL-0000Bv-EG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:00:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDDG-0006DQ-GE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:00:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDDG-0006DM-AW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:00:10 -0500 References: <1447171055-29567-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> <1447171055-29567-4-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> <56422A70.8040306@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5642309F.6030908@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:59:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] disas/arm: avoid clang shifting negative signed warning List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi , Eduardo Habkost On 10/11/2015 18:48, Peter Maydell wrote: > It could be they're attempting to warn us now about the possibility > that in a future version of clang they will start using this UB > to optimize with. Good luck to them. Paolo