From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zww47-0000TL-KN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:53:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zww44-0007y2-FA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:53:43 -0500 References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Message-ID: <5644D222.3070408@suse.de> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:53:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 17/24] qom/object: fix 2 comment typos List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Cao jin Am 06.11.2015 um 13:43 schrieb Michael Tokarev: > From: Cao jin >=20 > Also change the misleading definition of macro OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK >=20 > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev Michael, please *STOP* queuing QOM patches! You merged the unfixed version now - it's supposed to have just "qom:", and the parenthesis and full stop are missing, too, that I had on qom-next before it disappeared with today's rebase... And why was I not CC'ed on this submission as include/qom/object.h maintainer? You did not reply to the patch either, where I did. Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=FC= rnberg)