From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: benh@au1.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, agraf@suse.de,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com,
Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] target-ppc: Handle NMI guest exit
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:03:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56458B57.3010407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151113015715.GJ4886@voom.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1923 bytes --]
On 13/11/15 02:57, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:40:11AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 12/11/15 09:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 11/11/15 18:16, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
[...]
>>>> + qemu_mutex_lock(&spapr->mc_in_progress);
>>>
>>> Using a mutex here is definitely wrong. The kvm_arch_handle_exit() code
>>> is run under the Big QEMU Lock™ (see qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() in
>>> kvm_cpu_exec()),
[...]
>> Ok, I now had a look into the LoPAPR spec, and if I've got that right,
>> you really have to serialize the NMIs in case they happen at multiple
>> CPUs at the same time. So I guess the best thing you can do here is
>> something like:
>>
>> while (spapr->mc_in_progress) {
>> /*
>> * There is already another NMI in progress, thus we need
>> * to yield here to wait until it has been finsihed
>> */
>> qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>> usleep(10);
>> qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>> }
>> spapr->mc_in_progress = true;
[...]
> You should be able to avoid the nasty usleep by using a pthread
> condition variable. So here you'd have
>
> while (spapr->mc_in_progress) {
> pthread_cond_wait(&mc_delivery_cond, &qemu_iothread_lock);
> }
> spapr->mc_in_progress = true;
>
> Or.. there may be qemu wrappers around the pthread functions you
> should be using. Once delivery of a single MC is complete, you'd use
> pthread_cond_signal() to wake up any additional ones.
>
> pthread_cond_wait automatically drops the specified mutex internally,
> so access to mc_in_progress itself is still protected by the iothread
> mutex.
That's a nice one, didn't know that function yet! And actually, there is
already a QEMU wrapper function: qemu_cond_wait() - so this should be
used instead since threads on Windows are working differently in QEMU as
far as I know.
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-11 17:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] target-ppc/spapr: Add FWNMI support in QEMU for PowerKVM guests Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-11 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: Extend rtas-blob Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-12 3:40 ` David Gibson
2015-11-12 8:26 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-12 11:53 ` David Gibson
2015-11-12 18:59 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-11 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] spapr: Register and handle HCALL to receive updated RTAS region Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-12 3:42 ` David Gibson
2015-11-12 5:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-11-12 7:23 ` David Gibson
2015-11-11 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "ibm, nmi-interlock" RTAS calls Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-12 4:02 ` David Gibson
2015-11-12 18:04 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-12 9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-12 18:52 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-11 17:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] target-ppc: Handle NMI guest exit Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-12 4:29 ` David Gibson
2015-11-12 5:20 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-12 8:09 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-12 9:40 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-12 18:49 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-16 7:52 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-16 10:07 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-16 10:41 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-16 11:57 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-13 1:57 ` David Gibson
2015-11-13 7:03 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2015-11-16 5:45 ` David Gibson
2015-11-12 18:23 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-13 1:58 ` David Gibson
2015-11-13 4:53 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-13 5:57 ` David Gibson
2015-11-13 6:27 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-19 1:56 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-19 16:02 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-16 3:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-11-16 9:01 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-16 11:29 ` Aravinda Prasad
2015-11-16 21:46 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-11-12 4:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] target-ppc/spapr: Add FWNMI support in QEMU for PowerKVM guests David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56458B57.3010407@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).