From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyGT1-000181-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:52:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyGSy-0001sc-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:52:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyGSx-0001sX-TJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:52:51 -0500 References: <1447601946-31248-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> <5649966C.7070702@redhat.com> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Message-ID: <5649A770.5070908@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:52:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5649966C.7070702@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/4] hw/pcie: Multi-root support for Q35 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, kraxel@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com On 11/16/2015 10:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 15/11/2015 16:39, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> Addressed Gerd Hoffmann comments: >> - Added x-enable-internal-bridge compat property to keep the PCI >> bridge for older machine to avoid breaking migration. > > This will break PXB command lines written for "-M pc" in QEMU <= 2.5. > Technically there's no prohibition against doing so, but we've never > done it; I'm not sure why we should start doing so now. Hi Paolo, Can you please explain how does it break the command line? For QEMU < 2.5 we automatically have the x-enable-internal-bridge compat property "on" so the command line remains the same. For QEMU >= 2.5 is "off" by default and the bridge disappear, without command line changes. > > Can we have two devices, on for a PCI expander bridge and one for a PCIe > expander bridge? Gerd also asked for this, OK, I am going for it. Thanks, Marcel > > Paolo >