From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 2.5] QEMU does not care about left shifts of signed negative values
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:36:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564B73BF.1080800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_EVUTGMqbCR7OZ-iUiHDp-OJM3B2WgGQ8-krzp-sF69g@mail.gmail.com>
On 17/11/2015 19:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 November 2015 at 18:21, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/11/2015 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> That doesn't seem like more than half-good news to me. In particular,
>>> if ubsan is still diagnosing these cases and they're still a
>>> problem in some constant expressions
>>
>> Constant expressions are standardese for e.g.
>>
>> static int x = 1 << 31;
>>
>> It doesn't mean _all_ constants, and the warning only triggers with
>> -pedantic.
>
> But if "-fwrapv" means "this dialect of C makes shifts of
> negative numbers well defined and OK" then "-1 << 31"
> should be fine and should not provoke a warning (whether in
> a constant expression or not). If that's not what -fwrapv means,
> then we shouldn't be using it as if it did.
Since we don't use -pedantic, we don't care. But I agree that it could
be the subject of a separate fix. For now I'll focus on ubsan since
that's the more important one.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-17 14:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 2.5] QEMU does not care about left shifts of signed negative values Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-17 14:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-11-17 15:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-11-17 16:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-11-17 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-17 18:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-11-17 17:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-11-17 17:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-17 18:19 ` Peter Maydell
2015-11-17 18:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-17 18:24 ` Peter Maydell
2015-11-17 18:36 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-11-17 18:40 ` Peter Maydell
2015-11-17 18:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-11-17 19:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-17 18:24 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564B73BF.1080800@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).