From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GTG5p-0005sB-Lu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:59:45 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GTG5n-0005pQ-20
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:59:44 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTG5m-0005pN-TS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:59:42 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.191] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTGB4-0005eB-Qd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:05:11 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so1281792nfa
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <564d96fb0609290359t7364ea5aq502588c498135bd0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:59:40 -0300
From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Rafael_Esp=C3=ADndola?=" <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bug in ARM thumb usermode emulation
In-Reply-To: <200609182117.00519.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <564d96fb0609181305n14cf7afexefd50b5cd724428d@mail.gmail.com>
	<200609182117.00519.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> TLS and multithreaded applications are known to not work with usermode
> emulation.

In the end, it was an uninitialized stack allocated variable in libc
that was causing this problem
(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2006-09/msg00063.html).

> Paul
>

Thanks,
Rafael