From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Engraf <david.engraf@sysgo.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu_mutex_iothread_locked not correctly synchronized
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:54:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5654883F.9050509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565485A0.5090902@sysgo.com>
On 24/11/2015 16:43, David Engraf wrote:
> Commit afbe70535ff1a8a7a32910cc15ebecc0ba92e7da introduced the function
> qemu_mutex_iothread_locked to avoid recursive locking of the iothread
> lock. The iothread_locked variable uses the __thread attribute which
> results in a per thread storage location whereas the qemu_global_mutex
> is not thread specific. This leads to race conditions because the
> variable is not in sync between threads.
Frankly, this makes no sense. You're modifying the
qemu_mutex_iothread_locked function to return whether _some_ thread has
taken the mutex, but the function tells you whether _the calling_ thread
has taken the mutex (that's the point about recursive locking). This
breaks the callers of qemu_mutex_iothread_locked completely.
The variable need not be in sync between the different threads; each
thread only needs to know about itself. The current code works because:
1) the iothread mutex is not locked before qemu_mutex_lock_iothread
2) the iothread mutex is not locked after qemu_mutex_lock_iothread
3) qemu_cond_wait doesn't matter because the thread does not run during
a qemu_cond_wait.
> I triggered this problem reproducible on a Windows machine whereas Linux works fine.
What are the symptoms, and what is your Windows compiler?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 15:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu_mutex_iothread_locked not correctly synchronized David Engraf
2015-11-24 15:54 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-11-25 9:08 ` David Engraf
2015-11-25 12:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] " David Engraf
2015-11-25 13:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-25 14:04 ` David Engraf
2015-11-25 14:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-25 15:48 ` David Engraf
2015-11-25 16:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-26 9:12 ` David Engraf
2015-11-26 11:25 ` Stefan Weil
2015-11-26 14:26 ` David Engraf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5654883F.9050509@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=david.engraf@sysgo.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).