From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1VKZ-0007vc-Lp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:21:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1VKV-0002Op-OP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:21:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1VKV-0002Oj-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:21:31 -0500 References: <1447875909-14632-1-git-send-email-Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com> <56552493.7040001@redhat.com> <5655518F.20405@weilnetz.de> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <56556F80.8070408@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:21:20 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5655518F.20405@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] net/tap-win32 bugfixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil , Andrew Baumann , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 11/25/2015 02:13 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 25.11.2015 um 04:01 schrieb Jason Wang: >> >> On 11/25/2015 07:36 AM, Andrew Baumann wrote: >>> Ping? >>> >>> Jason, I know you planned to leave this for a few days... I just wanted to make sure it isn't forgotten :) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrew >> Thanks for working on this. I would expect Stefan to review v2 (since he >> reviewed v1). >> >> Stefan, could you please review v2? > > Hi Jason, > > patch 1/2 already contains my Reviewed-by, but I cannot say > much about patch 2/2, simply because I cannot test it. > > As the changes in 2/2 look plausible, I suggest nevertheless > to apply both patches for QEMU 2.5. What would be the correct > way to indicate this? Acked-by: Stefan Weil ? > Feel free to add it to patch 2/2 if needed. > > Kind regards, > Stefan Thanks for the reviewing. Apply the series for 2.5 in my -net tree.