From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565DCC97.5020504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448987005-28335-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
On 12/01/2015 06:23 PM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> In 1811e64 'hw/virtio: Add PCIe capability to virtio devices', the
> QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability was added to virtio's pci_dev, within
> 'virtio_pci_realize' - the pci device object realization method.
>
> This occurs to late, as 'pci_qdev_realize' (DeviceClass.realize of
> TYPE_PCI_DEVICE) has already been called, without knowing that the
> device instance is indeed an "express" instance, thus allocating
> insufficient pci config space.
>
> As a result, device may crash upon attempt to write to the PCIE config
> space.
>
> Fix, by arming the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in virtio-pci's
> own DeviceClass realize method.
>
> This also makes code cleaner, as 'virtio_pci_realize' may now access the
> 'pci_is_express' predicate when needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index dd48562..cee1b7b 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -1814,13 +1814,10 @@ static void virtio_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
>
> address_space_init(&proxy->modern_as, &proxy->modern_cfg, "virtio-pci-cfg-as");
>
> - if (!(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE)
> - && !(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_MODERN)
> - && pci_bus_is_express(pci_dev->bus)
> - && !pci_bus_is_root(pci_dev->bus)) {
> + if (pci_is_express(pci_dev) && pci_bus_is_express(pci_dev->bus) &&
> + !pci_bus_is_root(pci_dev->bus)) {
> int pos;
Hi,
Here you should check only for 'pci_is_express(pci_dev)' .
>
> - pci_dev->cap_present |= QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
> pos = pcie_endpoint_cap_init(pci_dev, 0);
> assert(pos > 0);
>
> @@ -1879,10 +1876,25 @@ static Property virtio_pci_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> +static void virtio_pci_dc_realize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + VirtioPCIClass *vpciklass = VIRTIO_PCI_GET_CLASS(qdev);
> + VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_PCI(qdev);
> + PCIDevice *pci_dev = &proxy->pci_dev;
> +
> + if (!(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE) &&
> + !(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_MODERN)) {
> + pci_dev->cap_present |= QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
And here you should also check:
pci_bus_is_express(pci_dev->bus) && !pci_bus_is_root(pci_dev->bus))
The reason is the device becomes express only if *all* the conditions are met.
> + }
> +
> + vpciklass->saved_dc_realize(qdev, errp);
> +}
> +
> static void virtio_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> + VirtioPCIClass *vpciklass = VIRTIO_PCI_CLASS(klass);
>
> dc->props = virtio_pci_properties;
> k->realize = virtio_pci_realize;
> @@ -1890,6 +1902,8 @@ static void virtio_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET;
> k->revision = VIRTIO_PCI_ABI_VERSION;
> k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_OTHERS;
> + vpciklass->saved_dc_realize = dc->realize;
> + dc->realize = virtio_pci_dc_realize;
> dc->reset = virtio_pci_reset;
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> index ffb74bb..f18e948 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ typedef struct {
>
> typedef struct VirtioPCIClass {
> PCIDeviceClass parent_class;
> + DeviceRealize saved_dc_realize;
I would change the name to parent_realize :)
Also please add "for-2.5" to prefix.
Thanks for posting it!
Marcel
> void (*realize)(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp);
> } VirtioPCIClass;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 16:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-01 16:36 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2015-12-01 19:30 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-01 20:46 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 8:01 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 9:51 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 13:30 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 14:00 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 14:27 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565DCC97.5020504@redhat.com \
--to=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).