qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:00:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <565EF989.9030300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202153012.08b80fd9@pixies>

On 12/02/2015 03:30 PM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:51:46 +0200, marcel@redhat.com wrote:
>> 2. We still have pci_is_express returning true, this is error prone because
>> one can use this function assuming the device is express. Maybe we should
>> call it "can_be_express" ?
>>
>> If you think this is good enough, you can simply do the same:
>>     - Instead of replacing the realize method, just advertise it with
>>       "is_express" (meaning it can be express)
>>     - Leave all the conditions as they were in prev patch.
>> As a result, the pci config space will have the right length.
>
> Oh but we can't do so, as the change of config space size is guest
> visible and breaks migration; it must depend on your x-pcie-disable
> flag :)

Indeed, we need at least to condition it on  x-pcie-disable.

>
> As I can't decide what's better, I'm following your initial suggestion
> and submit for maintainers to review.

Sure, and thanks for the patience to get to the bottom of it.

>
> However, do note that there are few more evidence that 'pci_is_express'
> is true while not necessarily placed on a pcie bus:

and this is scary ... we really should call it "pci_can_be_express"

> - pcie_endpoint_cap_init:
>    it tests for 'pci_bus_is_express' although 'dev' is guaranteed to be
>    'pci_is_express' (assertion in pcie_cap_init)
> - 058fdcf 'xhci: add endpoint cap on express bus only'


Thanks,
Marcel

>
> Thanks,
> Shmulik
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-01 16:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-01 16:36 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-01 19:30   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-01 20:46     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02  8:01       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02  9:51         ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 13:30           ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 14:00             ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2015-12-02 14:27               ` Shmulik Ladkani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=565EF989.9030300@redhat.com \
    --to=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).