From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [2.5 issue] virtio-1 in virtio-net and old vhost
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:06:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660F542.8010309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202111128.03f4f46d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
On 12/02/2015 06:11 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:54:09 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I wonder instead of rolling back in post_plugged(), maybe we could just
>> delay the region setups to post_plugged().
> If this is the saner thing to do for pci, sure.
>
>> Or just call transport
>> specific device_plugged() after get_features() call in
>> virtio_bus_device_plugged().
> The problem is that the VERSION_1 bit is only added in the
> ->device_plugged() callbacks by the transport, so ->get_features() can
> only be called after that. We have a dependency in both directions :(
Ok.
>
>> And I'm not sure we need to handle
>> migration compatibility in this case.
> The thing we would need to care about is basically the host kernel on
> the target supporting less than the host kernel on the source. Do we
> care about that in other contexts right now?
The problem is for pci: without this patch, guest may always see modern
bar is "disable-modern=false". But with this patch, on an old kernel
that does not support VERSION_1, even "disable-modern=false" were
specified, guest can not see modern bar anymore. Looks like a guest
visible change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-04 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 10:11 [Qemu-devel] [2.5 issue] virtio-1 in virtio-net and old vhost Cornelia Huck
2015-12-01 12:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-01 14:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-02 5:54 ` Jason Wang
2015-12-02 10:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-02 12:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-12-04 2:06 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-12-04 10:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-04 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5660F542.8010309@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).