From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 2/3] spapr_drc: Change value of property "fdt" from null back to {}
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:41:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660FD77.90500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203235408.GC9559@voom.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2426 bytes --]
On 12/03/2015 04:54 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:37:39PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> prop_get_fdt() misuses the visitor API: when fdt is null, it doesn't
>> visit anything. object_property_get_qobject() happily
>> object_property_get_qobject(). Amazingly, the latter survives the
>> misuse. Turns out we've papered over it long before prop_get_fdt()
>> existed, in commit 1d10b44.
>>
>> However, commit 6c2f9a1 changed how we paper over it, and as a side
>> effect changed qom-get's value from {} to null. Change it right back
>> by fixing the visitor misuse.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
> I'm not entirely convinced by this. IIUC, this makes the output in
> the case of NULL (i.e. missing) fdt identical to the output in the
> case of an empty, valid fdt - in dtc syntax, this:
> / {
> };
>
> Those are different cases from the point of view of the code which
> actually uses the fdt, and for purposes of debugging it, I suspect we
> want to expose that difference.
Expressing null may be the right thing, but it should be a conscious
decision, and not a side-effect of an unrelated patch. This patch is
just about avoiding a regression for 2.5, because outputting {} for both
a missing fdt and an empty one was the behavior we had back in 2.4 (that
is, we've already returned {} in at least one release, so it won't hurt
to do it for one more). For 2.6 we can revisit things to actually
express what is wanted.
>
> I don't know what the QOMishly correct way of doing that is, though.
> Can we somehow make the "fdt" property disappear entirely if fdt is
> NULL?
In qapi terms, if a variable is marked optional and has_FOO is false,
then the variable disappears completely. But I'm not sure if that maps
over to qom. Maybe you do it by setting errp if drc->fdt is NULL, so
that prop_get_fdt() only succeeds when there is something for it to
return. Or maybe returning qnull() is right after all, but in that
case, explicitly calling 'QObject *n = qnull(); visit_type_any(v, &n,
NULL, &err) seems like a nicer way than relying on side effects of how
the qmp output visitor behaves when nothing was visited.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-04 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 16:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 0/3] spapr_drc: Last minute bug fixes Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 1/3] spapr_drc: Handle visitor errors properly Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 16:45 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-03 23:45 ` David Gibson
2015-12-03 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 2/3] spapr_drc: Change value of property "fdt" from null back to {} Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 16:54 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-03 17:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 17:30 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-03 17:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-12-04 13:22 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-03 23:54 ` David Gibson
2015-12-04 2:41 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2015-12-04 5:50 ` David Gibson
2015-12-04 8:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 3/3] spapr_drc: Make device "spapr-dr-connector" unavailable with -device Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 16:55 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-03 17:18 ` Thomas Huth
2015-12-03 23:55 ` David Gibson
2015-12-03 18:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 0/3] spapr_drc: Last minute bug fixes Markus Armbruster
2015-12-03 23:57 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5660FD77.90500@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).