From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a70nD-0003lA-B6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:57:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a70n9-00089b-8Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:57:55 -0500 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:34421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a70n8-000892-VF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:57:51 -0500 References: <29597206.QFPkAPGnES@dabox> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <566976CB.9070307@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:57:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <29597206.QFPkAPGnES@dabox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu AT24Cxx List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tim Sander Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2015-12-10 13:51, Tim Sander wrote: > Hi Jan > > I have seen your patches for AT24Cxx functionality in qemu: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-04/msg05714.html > > As i am interested in this work i am wondering what happend to this effort? Internally in heavy use (not sure right now if it is being rebased frequently, though), but we lost the energy to finally push it upstream. What was missing was probably "only" some proper qtest unit tests. If you want to pick up on this, that would be very welcome. I may have some hours to look into it again as well, though possibly not this year any more (yeah...). Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux