From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Michael Tsirkin <mtsirkin@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] setting fadt->century
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:17:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5669897C.3090803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5669876E.1040102@redhat.com>
On 10/12/2015 15:08, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> The RTC CMOS RAM index to the century of data value (hundred and
> thousand year decimals). If this field contains a zero, then the
> RTC centenary feature is not supported. If this field has a
> non-zero value, then this field contains an index into RTC RAM
> space that OSPM can use to program the centenary field.
>
> Since the i440fx and Q35 machine types of the i386/x86_64 targets always
> include the RTC device -- rtc_init() --, and said RTC device supports
> the "centenary feature" -- see RTC_CENTURY in "hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c"
> --, I think the fadt_setup() function should set fadt->century to
> RTC_CENTURY.
>
> Do you guys agree?
Yes.
> If so, should 2.5 and earlier machine types be shielded from this change?
I think this shouldn't be necessary.
Paolo
> Currently the field is left at zero:
>
> [06Ch 0108 1] RTC Century Index : 00
>
> which -- according to analysis done by Ruiyu Ni at Intel -- should cause
> Linux and Windows 8+ to think the RTC centenary feature is unavailable,
> and cause Windows 7 to (incorrectly) assume that the offset to use is
> 0x32. (Which happens to be the right value, but Windows 7 is wrong to
> assume anything at all).
>
> Fixing this would inform Linux and Windows 8+ about the right
> capabilities of the hardware, plus retrofit the FADT to Windows 7's
> behavior.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-10 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-10 14:08 [Qemu-devel] setting fadt->century Laszlo Ersek
2015-12-10 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5669897C.3090803@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mtsirkin@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).