From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 1/1] blockdev: Mark {insert, remove}-medium experimental
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:30:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <566AEC0B.1070009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449847385-13986-2-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1912 bytes --]
On 12/11/2015 08:23 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> While in the long term we want throttling to be its own block filter
> BDS, in the short term we want it to be part of the BB instead of a BDS;
> even in the long term we may want legacy throttling to be automatically
> tied to the BB.
>
> blockdev-insert-medium and blockdev-remove-medium do not retain
> throttling information in the BB (deliberately so). Therefore, using
> them means tying this information to a BDS, which would break the model
> described above. (The same applies to other flags such as
> detect_zeroes.) We probably want to move this information to the BB or
> its own filter BDS before blockdev-{insert,remove}-medium can be
> considered completely stable.
>
> Therefore, mark these functions experimental for the time being.
>
> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> +++ b/qmp-commands.hx
> @@ -4203,13 +4203,13 @@ Example:
> EQMP
>
> {
> - .name = "blockdev-remove-medium",
> + .name = "x-blockdev-remove-medium",
> .args_type = "device:s",
> - .mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_blockdev_remove_medium,
> + .mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_x_blockdev_remove_medium,
> },
>
> SQMP
> -blockdev-remove-medium
> +x-blockdev-remove-medium
> ----------------------
Formatting nit, but not worth holding this up (as it is really our last
chance to get it in 2.5 before baking in something we'd be stuck with).
>
> SQMP
> -blockdev-insert-medium
> +x-blockdev-insert-medium
> ----------------------
Ditto.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-11 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-11 15:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 0/1] blockdev: Mark {insert, remove}-medium experimental Max Reitz
2015-12-11 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 1/1] " Max Reitz
2015-12-11 15:30 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2015-12-11 15:40 ` Peter Maydell
2015-12-11 15:43 ` Max Reitz
2015-12-11 16:19 ` Peter Maydell
2015-12-14 13:47 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=566AEC0B.1070009@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).