From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49301)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1a7Pqs-000241-BE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:43:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1a7Pqm-0008PX-Gs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:43:22 -0500
References: <1449847385-13986-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
	<1449847385-13986-2-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
	<566AEC0B.1070009@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA-hsVPYu=Ad0A=5gWeXSNxV6vSCyroptCv8HC6sQFG-XA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <566AEF0D.4070705@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:43:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-hsVPYu=Ad0A=5gWeXSNxV6vSCyroptCv8HC6sQFG-XA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 1/1] blockdev: Mark {insert,
 remove}-medium experimental
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

On 2015-12-11 at 16:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 December 2015 at 15:30, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 12/11/2015 08:23 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>>>
>>>   SQMP
>>> -blockdev-remove-medium
>>> +x-blockdev-remove-medium
>>>   ----------------------
>>
>> Formatting nit, but not worth holding this up (as it is really our last
>> chance to get it in 2.5 before baking in something we'd be stuck with).
>
> You mean the length of the underline, right? I can fix that up
> as I apply it.

I'd appreciate that, thanks!

Max