From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
den@openvz.org, jsnow@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 RFC] spec: add qcow2 bitmaps extension specification
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:15:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5678DC5E.5090501@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <567891AC.6070609@redhat.com>
On 22.12.2015 02:56, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 21.12.2015 16:25, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> The new feature for qcow2: storing bitmaps.
>>
>> Only bitmaps, relative to the virtual disk, stored in qcow2 file, should
>> be stored in this qcow2 file.
>>
>> Strings started from +# are RFC-strings, not to be commited of course
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> v5:
>>
>> - 'Dirty bitmaps' renamed to 'Bitmaps', as we may have several types of
>> bitmaps.
>> - rewordings
>> - move upper bounds to "Notes about Qemu limits"
>> - s/should/must somewhere. (but not everywhere)
>> - move name_size field closer to name itself in bitmap header
>> - add extra data area to bitmap header
>> - move bitmap data description to separate section
>>
>>
>>
>> docs/specs/qcow2.txt | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 159 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Looks good! :-)
Thank you! )
>
> Some comments below, but I think the general design is good now.
>
>> diff --git a/docs/specs/qcow2.txt b/docs/specs/qcow2.txt
>> index 121dfc8..3d557ee 100644
>> --- a/docs/specs/qcow2.txt
>> +++ b/docs/specs/qcow2.txt
>> @@ -103,7 +103,19 @@ in the description of a field.
>> write to an image with unknown auto-clear features if it
>> clears the respective bits from this field first.
>>
>> - Bits 0-63: Reserved (set to 0)
>> + Bit 0: Bitmaps extension bit.
>> + This bit is responsible for Bitmaps extension
>> + consistency.
>> +
>> + If it is set, but there is no Bitmaps
>> + extension, this should be considered as an
>> + error.
>> +
>> + If it is not set, but there is a Bitmaps
>> + extension, its data should be considered as
>> + inconsistent.
>> +
>> + Bits 1-63: Reserved (set to 0)
>>
>> 96 - 99: refcount_order
>> Describes the width of a reference count block entry (width
>> @@ -123,6 +135,7 @@ be stored. Each extension has a structure like the following:
>> 0x00000000 - End of the header extension area
>> 0xE2792ACA - Backing file format name
>> 0x6803f857 - Feature name table
>> + 0x23852875 - Bitmaps extension
>> other - Unknown header extension, can be safely
>> ignored
>>
>> @@ -166,6 +179,34 @@ the header extension data. Each entry look like this:
>> terminated if it has full length)
>>
>>
>> +== Bitmaps extension ==
>> +
>> +Bitmaps extension is an optional header extension. It provides an ability to
>> +store virtual disk related bitmaps in a qcow2 image. For now there is only one
>> +type of such bitmaps: Dirty Tracking Bitmap, which just tracks virtual disk
>> +changes from some moment.
>> +
>> +The data of the extension should be considered as consistent only if
>> +corresponding auto-clear feature bit is set (see autoclear_features above).
>> +
>> +The fields of Bitmaps extension are:
>> +
>> + 0 - 3: nb_bitmaps
>> + The number of bitmaps contained in the image. Must be
>> + greater or equal to 1.
>> +
>> + Note: Qemu currently only supports up to 65535 bitmaps per
>> + image.
>> +
>> + 4 - 7: bitmap_directory_size
>> + Size of the Bitmap Directory in bytes. It must be equal to
>> + sum of sizes of all (nb_bitmaps) bitmap headers.
> I'd rather write this as: "Size of the Bitmap Directory in bytes, i.e.
> the cumulative size of all (nb_bitmaps) bitmap headers."
>
> ("It must" sounds like it's an additional restriction while it's
> actually just an explanation.)
>
>> +
>> + 8 - 15: bitmap_directory_offset
>> + Offset into the image file at which the Bitmap Directory
>> + starts. Must be aligned to a cluster boundary.
>> +
>> +
>> == Host cluster management ==
>>
>> qcow2 manages the allocation of host clusters by maintaining a reference count
>> @@ -360,3 +401,120 @@ Snapshot table entry:
>>
>> variable: Padding to round up the snapshot table entry size to the
>> next multiple of 8.
>> +
>> +
>> +== Bitmaps ==
>> +
>> +The feature supports storing bitmaps in a qcow2 image. All bitmaps are related
>> +to the virtual disk, stored in this image.
>> +
>> +=== Bitmap Directory ===
>> +
>> +Each bitmap saved in the image is described in a Bitmap Directory entry. Bitmap
>> +Directory is a contiguous area in the image file, whose starting offset and
>> +length are given by the header extension fields bitmap_directory_offset and
>> +bitmap_directory_size. The entries of the bitmap directory have variable
>> +length, depending on the length of the bitmap name and extra data. These
>> +entries are also called bitmap headers.
>> +
>> +Bitmap Directory Entry:
>> +
>> + Byte 0 - 7: bitmap_table_offset
>> + Offset into the image file at which the Bitmap Table
>> + (described below) for the bitmap starts. Must be aligned to
>> + a cluster boundary.
>> +
>> + 8 - 11: bitmap_table_size
>> + Number of entries in the Bitmap Table of the bitmap.
>> +
>> + 12 - 15: flags
>> + Bit
>> + 0: in_use
>> + The bitmap was not saved correctly and may be
>> + inconsistent.
>> +
>> + 1: auto
>> + The bitmap must reflect all changes of the virtual
>> + disk by any application that would write to this qcow2
>> + file (including writes, snapshot switching, etc.). The
>> + type of this bitmap must be 'Dirty Tracking Bitmap'.
>> +
>> + Bits 2 - 31 are reserved and must be 0.
>> +
>> + 16: type
>> + This field describes the sort of the bitmap.
>> + Values:
>> + 0: Dirty Tracking Bitmap
>> +
>> + Values 1 - 255 are reserved.
>> +# Is there any reason, to make it '1 - Dirty Tracking Bitmap, 0,2-255 - reserved?'
> Maybe something arbitrary like "But 0 feels like 'unknown' to me!". But
> I can't think of anything substantial.
>
>> +
>> + 17: granularity_bits
>> + Granularity bits. Valid values are: 0 - 63.
>> +
>> + Note: Qemu currently doesn't support granularity_bits
>> + greater than 31.
>> +
>> + Granularity is calculated as
>> + granularity = 1 << granularity_bits
>> +
>> + Granularity of the bitmap is how many bytes of the image
>> + accounts for one bit of the bitmap.
>> +
>> + 18 - 19: name_size
>> + Size of the bitmap name. Valid values: 1 - 1023.
>> +
>> + 20 - 21: extra_data_size
>> + Size of type-specific extra data.
>> +# 2 bytes or 4 bytes ?
> I'd make it 4. I don't think those additional two bytes will hurt
> anybody, and the simple fact that you're asking that question shows to
> me that there is a possibility that 2 won't be enough. ;-)
>
>> +
>> + variable: The name of the bitmap (not null terminated). Must be
>> + unique among all bitmap names within the Bitmaps extension.
>> +
>> + variable: Type-specific extra data for the bitmap.
> I'd swap name and type-specific data so we know the alignment of the
> type-specific data (if they are swapped and sizeof(extra_data_size) ==
> 4, its alignment will be 4). Maybe that'll come in handy at some point.
Good thing, thanks. It will be even 8)
>
> Maybe you should make a note that currently, no extra data is defined
> for Dirty Tracking Bitmaps, but that this may change in the future.
>
> Max
>
>> + variable: Padding to round up the Bitmap Directory Entry size to the
>> + next multiple of 8.
>> +
>> +=== Bitmap Table ===
>> +
>> +Bitmaps are stored using a one-level (not two-level like refcounts and guest
>> +clusters mapping) structure for the mapping of bitmaps data to host clusters.
>> +It is called Bitmap Table.
>> +
>> +Each Bitmap Table has a variable size (stored in the Bitmap Directory Entry)
>> +and may use multiple clusters, however it must be contiguous in the image file.
>> +
>> +Bitmap Table entry:
>> +
>> + Bit 0: Reserved and must be zero if bits 9 - 55 are non-zero.
>> + If bits 9 - 55 are zero:
>> + 0: Cluster should be read as all zeros.
>> + 1: Cluster should be read as all ones.
>> +
>> + 1 - 8: Reserved and must be zero.
>> +
>> + 9 - 55: Bits 9 - 55 of host cluster offset. Must be aligned to a
>> + cluster boundary. If the offset is 0, the cluster is
>> + unallocated, see bit 0 description.
>> +
>> + 56 - 63: Reserved and must be zero.
>> +
>> +=== Bitmap Data ===
>> +
>> +As noted above, bitmap data is stored in several (or may be one, exactly
>> +bitmap_table_size) separate clusters, described by Bitmap Table. Given an
>> +offset (in bytes) into the bitmap data, the offset into the image file can be
>> +obtained as follows:
>> +
>> + image_offset =
>> + bitmap_table[bitmap_data_offset / cluster_size] +
>> + (bitmap_data_offset % cluster_size)
>> +
>> +Taking into account the granularity of the bitmap, an offset in bits into the
>> +image file, corresponding to byte number byte_nr of the virtual disk can be
>> +calculated like this:
>> +
>> + bit_offset =
>> + image_offset(byte_nr / granularity / 8) * 8 +
>> + (byte_nr / granularity) % 8
>>
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
* now, @virtuozzo.com instead of @parallels.com. Sorry for this inconvenience.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 15:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 RFC] spec: add qcow2 bitmaps extension specification Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-21 23:56 ` Max Reitz
2015-12-22 5:15 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5678DC5E.5090501@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).