From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aC2wI-0007FM-NE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 05:16:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aC2wE-0007nf-Lh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 05:16:06 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:47248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aC2wE-0007nZ-Fr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 05:16:02 -0500 Message-ID: <567BC48D.30007@virtuozzo.com> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:10:21 +0300 From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1450892961-6495-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <567B20D2.8070201@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <567B20D2.8070201@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] spec: add qcow2 bitmaps extension specification List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, jsnow@redhat.com On 24.12.2015 01:31, Max Reitz wrote: > On 23.12.2015 18:49, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> The new feature for qcow2: storing bitmaps. >> >> This patch adds new header extension to qcow2 - Bitmaps Extension. It >> provides an ability to store virtual disk related bitmaps in a qcow2 >> image. For now there is only one type of such bitmaps: Dirty Tracking >> Bitmap, which just tracks virtual disk changes from some moment. >> >> Note: Only bitmaps, relative to the virtual disk, stored in qcow2 file, >> should be stored in this qcow2 file. The size of each bitmap >> (considering its granularity) is equal to virtual disk size. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > I see some issues regarding grammar and phrasing, but I still think > nagging about that should be left to native speakers and for the non-RFC > versions. I've already removed 'RFC' mark) > (Or someone can just fix it up on top.) > > Semantically-reviewed-by: Max Reitz > > Thanks! > -- Best regards, Vladimir * now, @virtuozzo.com instead of @parallels.com. Sorry for this inconvenience.