From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
Cc: Ling Liu <liuling-it@360.cn>,
Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATVH v2] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:18:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5684D6AC.7030701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512311120590.16883@wniryva>
On 12/31/2015 01:56 PM, P J P wrote:
> +-- On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Jason Wang wrote --+
> | > - (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> | > + if (addr < 32 || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> |
> | The change is unnecessary.
>
> Okay.
>
> | > + if (addr < 32
> | > + || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> | > + && addr + sizeof(uint16_t) < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> |
> | I think you mean '<=' instead of '<' here? (And for the other checks below).
>
> I think <= would lead to an off-by-one, no?
The real byte we could touch is in fact addr + sizeof(uint16_t) -1 here.
Consider we should allow double bytes access at NE2000_MEM_SIZE - 2, but
this patch forbids this.
Btw, looking at ne2000_mem_writew(), it has:
addr &= ~1;
at the beginning, so looks like we are really safe, Need only to care
about writel?
> As the last array index would be
> one less than the size; Same as ne2000_mem_readb() above.
>
> Thank you.
> --
> Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
> 47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-31 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-31 4:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATVH v2] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations P J P
2015-12-31 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2015-12-31 5:56 ` P J P
2015-12-31 7:18 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-12-31 11:49 ` P J P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5684D6AC.7030701@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=liuling-it@360.cn \
--cc=pjp@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).