From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHCO5-0005Yb-DH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:22:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHCO0-0006Dy-Du for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:22:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHCO0-0006Ds-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:22:00 -0500 References: <1452091659-17698-1-git-send-email-ashoks@broadcom.com> <568dfd6e.2966420a.4f765.fffff89dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <568E8291.2090109@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:21:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Initialize NICs configured in PCI bus List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Ashok Kumar Cc: Jason Wang , QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi On 07/01/2016 15:47, Peter Maydell wrote: > I think my current inclination is to say that virt should > support -net, because I would prefer to avoid having yet > another speedbump in the path of people trying to move to > using KVM-on-ARM based on their previous experience with > KVM-on-x86. I agree. Paolo