From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42793) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHYeT-0000Io-9L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:08:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHYeQ-0001um-20 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:08:29 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::244]:36103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHYeP-0001ue-RN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:08:25 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 6so37240936qgy.3 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:08:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson References: <1450385695-1940-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <5682D80C.9070809@ilande.co.uk> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <568FD0E4.5080003@twiddle.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:08:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5682D80C.9070809@ilande.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/25] target-sparc improvements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: aurelien@aurel32.net On 12/29/2015 10:59 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > If there are explicit bug-fixes related to above then my preference > would be to have them as a separate patchset outside of the performance > improvements, but then if this isn't feasible then I don't feel that > this should block getting this patches applied to master. Heh. If there are bugs fixed, it's accidental. I was attempting to preserve behaviour with each patch. I wonder what changed... r~