From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37669)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1aIZ3W-0000pk-M7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:46:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1aIZ3V-0007dI-NT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:46:30 -0500
References: <1451359934-9236-1-git-send-email-lszhu@suse.com>
	<568C1C9A.7090802@redhat.com>
	<CAN05THRbm2pA8i-RBKGYupx9p0usvDT_Pk7UDFGvKFrt75vnbA@mail.gmail.com>
	<568D556D.2090408@redhat.com> <568E38FE.1080408@redhat.com>
	<56936C8B.3020305@kamp.de>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <569379E7.7010701@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:46:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56936C8B.3020305@kamp.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] send readcapacity10 when
 readcapacity16 failed
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, Zhu Lingshan <lszhu@suse.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>



On 11/01/2016 09:49, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > +            if (task != NULL && task->status == SCSI_STATUS_CHECK_CONDITION
> > +                && task->sense.key == SCSI_SENSE_UNIT_ATTENTION) {
> > +                break;
> > +            }
>
> Paolo, Ronnie, do you know what Readcapacity(10) returns if the target
> blocks count is greater than what can be described in 32bit?

Yes, it returns 0xFFFFFFFF.

> Anyway, is there a new version of this patch? I would also like to have a look
> before it is commited.

See https://github.com/bonzini/qemu/commit/1efcbda37.

Paolo